Like the rest of the nation, I am focused on the Arizona law, Senate Bill 1070. (SB 1070) I know that there are some of my readers that are upset that I have taken a stance in support of the bill. Some may want to boycott Arizona, its economy, maybe even my blog and upcoming book. So be it.
But, let me tell you this...As I write this, a Pinal County deputy sheriff is under attack at the intersections of I-8 and I-10 by people with heavy automatic weapons who are suspected of being undocumented immigrants. (read here, Illegal Aliens) They came across the border illegally and were headed for Phoenix. They were already breaking the law of the US government, so I guess they thought that all the other laws of the US and Arizona don't apply to them either. These are the people the law is aimed at... people who have come across the border illegally and do not see the laws of this country as something they should follow.
Today, the law was made clearer as Governor Brewer clarified the law. She added to the bill a clarification that says that a "legal contact" means a "lawful stop, detention or arrest." The wording of the law was also changed to further prohibit any form of racial profiling. Those who oppose the law forget that officers can only question people who are already involved in violations of law. The law that AZ has is already on the federal books, but local law enforcement cannot ask questions pertaining to immigration status because they are not trained to do so. This law provides for that training and for immediate detention of those who are here without the proper documents (ie. a driver's license, a government green card, a passport). Regular citizens who are not breaking the law have nothing to fear.
51% of all Americans agree with Arizona. I know its tough to be in the minority on this issue, but look at the larger picture. The federal government for years has done nothing, and now the problem is massive; just about 9 percent of the Arizona population is possibly illegal.
Instead of protesting what could happen, why aren't people upset that foreigners have invaded their country through a porous border that the federal government does not care about? Do they support the illegality of what these undocumented people have done? Shouldn't they be ethically and morally outraged because what these people have done and are doing undermines what they have done legally and the very fiber of this country?
Americans have always taken in those who are poor and who want a better life. My wife is a second generation American, her family came through Ellis Island. Her uncle's family and her uncle is listed there. They did things the right way. Why can't others do the same?
The protesters are concerned with POSSIBLE civil rights violations. They are not, however, concerned with these people who have BROKEN LAWS of the land by not coming into the country the right way.
Who, I ask you, is really wrong?
Friday, April 30, 2010
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Let's Set the Record Straight
The state of Arizona is hotter than usual right now, and not because of the climate. Well, at least not the weather climate. The oven was turned up on Arizona as a place to reside last week when Governor Brewer signed Senate Bill 1070 into law.
1070 is a law that is almost verbatim of federal law that calls for an enforcement of illegal immigration. What is does is, it gives police the tools to look at illegal immigrants who violate other laws of the state. For instance, an officer pulls over a speeding vehicle and asks to see the driver's license of the driver. The driver gives the officer the license and the officer writes a ticket. The license serves as proof that the driver is legal. End of stop.....Unless there is also an overloaded car, meaning there are 12 people in a car for 6. Now, the officer can ask to see the identification papers for the others. The officer finds that none of them have any ID, now there is a problem for them, and the driver.
Another scenario: An officer is driving down the street and sees a man just walking, not breaking any laws. Can the officer stop him and ask to see some identification? NO! The officer does not have a "reasonable suspicion" that the man is doing something illegal or is here illegally.
Seems simple, right? An officer can only question someone on their immigration status when they are doing something that is ILLEGAL! So, Maria, walking her children, CANNOT BE STOPPED and questioned! To me (yes, I am a white Anglo), this seems pretty cut and dried.
And the Federal Government already has this law in place. It just refuses to enforce it. From the President on down, NOTHING is being done about illegal immigration. This is tantamount to having a speed law and doing nothing, or maybe ignoring burglars, or, how about this...Kidnappers, rapists, and killers. What is the use of having a law if it is not going to be enforced? When you tell your kids, "NO!" and they do something, you better be ready to back it up with some punishment, or they will take advantage of you and get out of control.
That is what has happened. Illegal immigration is out of control. Now it is tough putting the genie back in the bottle.
Mexico has come out and pounded Arizona on the law. It has told its citizens to stop visiting here. (One of our citizens recently visited Mexico, and was stopped and searched without probable cause or reasonable suspicion over 20 times within 50 miles of the border.) Let me set the record straight. There is not a problem with Mexican tourists, only those who come through Mexico, cross the border illegally, then become a burden on Arizona because the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT says that these criminals have the right to get free medical care, free food, free housing. It is not free, Arizonans pay for it. And our state is broke.
People in Chicago, Illinois have protested against our new law. (Which is not yet in effect.) The City of San Francisco passed a law that it will not do business with companies who have ties to AZ, nor will its officials travel to AZ. These two areas do not see the problem, but then again, they do not have a population of almost a half a million illegal immigrants. (And, I think these two cities have enough on their plates with crime, etc. Heck, one alderman in Chicago asked the Governor of Illinois to send the National Guard to get crime under control!)
Today comes news that illegals are going to move out of Arizona. Let me recommend they go to one of two places: San Francisco or Chicago. Then let's see what happens when the shoe is on the other foot.
As for me? I'm boycotting tequila.
Doughnut
1070 is a law that is almost verbatim of federal law that calls for an enforcement of illegal immigration. What is does is, it gives police the tools to look at illegal immigrants who violate other laws of the state. For instance, an officer pulls over a speeding vehicle and asks to see the driver's license of the driver. The driver gives the officer the license and the officer writes a ticket. The license serves as proof that the driver is legal. End of stop.....Unless there is also an overloaded car, meaning there are 12 people in a car for 6. Now, the officer can ask to see the identification papers for the others. The officer finds that none of them have any ID, now there is a problem for them, and the driver.
Another scenario: An officer is driving down the street and sees a man just walking, not breaking any laws. Can the officer stop him and ask to see some identification? NO! The officer does not have a "reasonable suspicion" that the man is doing something illegal or is here illegally.
Seems simple, right? An officer can only question someone on their immigration status when they are doing something that is ILLEGAL! So, Maria, walking her children, CANNOT BE STOPPED and questioned! To me (yes, I am a white Anglo), this seems pretty cut and dried.
And the Federal Government already has this law in place. It just refuses to enforce it. From the President on down, NOTHING is being done about illegal immigration. This is tantamount to having a speed law and doing nothing, or maybe ignoring burglars, or, how about this...Kidnappers, rapists, and killers. What is the use of having a law if it is not going to be enforced? When you tell your kids, "NO!" and they do something, you better be ready to back it up with some punishment, or they will take advantage of you and get out of control.
That is what has happened. Illegal immigration is out of control. Now it is tough putting the genie back in the bottle.
Mexico has come out and pounded Arizona on the law. It has told its citizens to stop visiting here. (One of our citizens recently visited Mexico, and was stopped and searched without probable cause or reasonable suspicion over 20 times within 50 miles of the border.) Let me set the record straight. There is not a problem with Mexican tourists, only those who come through Mexico, cross the border illegally, then become a burden on Arizona because the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT says that these criminals have the right to get free medical care, free food, free housing. It is not free, Arizonans pay for it. And our state is broke.
People in Chicago, Illinois have protested against our new law. (Which is not yet in effect.) The City of San Francisco passed a law that it will not do business with companies who have ties to AZ, nor will its officials travel to AZ. These two areas do not see the problem, but then again, they do not have a population of almost a half a million illegal immigrants. (And, I think these two cities have enough on their plates with crime, etc. Heck, one alderman in Chicago asked the Governor of Illinois to send the National Guard to get crime under control!)
Today comes news that illegals are going to move out of Arizona. Let me recommend they go to one of two places: San Francisco or Chicago. Then let's see what happens when the shoe is on the other foot.
As for me? I'm boycotting tequila.
Doughnut
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Snakes in the Grass
It is early Sunday morning here in the Valley of the Sun, and true to its name, the day is going to be bright, warm, and beautiful. As I sat out on the patio watching the hummingbirds come and go, and the snakes slither along the flower bed (not really, honey, but it made a good picture of a great morning), I came to a sudden realization about my adopted home state. It is totally messed up!
Now, I lived in Illinois for about 54 years, and I saw just about every governor during my lifetime be indicted for something related to his office. (I'm pretty sure that Gov. Ogilvie escaped with his integrity.) Blago was the last straw, though.
When I moved to Arizona, I thought that all that would be left behind. Here, I thought, are people with common sense and who know what the law means. I thought things here would be above board, and truthful and laid back. Man, was I wrong!
Arizona was the last of the 48 contiguous states. It once was part of the Confederacy and its boundary with New Mexico once ran along the Gila River, and the two shared an east/west boundary, not a north/south one. Abe Lincoln changed all that. The capital of the territory/state was moved about five times before deciding on Phoenix. And Arizona was one of the first states to give women the right to vote and hold office...about eight years before the US Constitution. Arizonans, it seems have always been forward thinkers and people who value law and order (ala Wyatt Earp and his brothers).
They never did value education very highly, although the first governor of the state, George W.P. Hunt, got a law passed for mandatory education of 12 days a year for kids up to fourteen years of age! Arizonans do like their guns, and the idea that they vote on just about everything. Coming up in May, we will vote on a sales tax that will be in effect for three years and help fund education and just about everything else. How much? One cent per dollar! That would bring our state sales tax up to 6.6 cents per dollar. Now I know there are places that have less than that, but in Illinois, with all the various taxes, some places were as high as 9 percent. The 48th state ranks 48th in education, but then again, they don't spend money on it. Arizona spends about 6600 dollars per pupil, while Illinois spends close to 8800 dollars.
Now, AZ is in the forfront again when it comes to immigration enforcement! I don't think I have to go into that, as I covered that in previous blogs. Suffice it to say that I approve of the measure, and hope this kicks the Feds in the butt and gets the national debate open. Arizona has gone out on a limb here, and we'll see if other states help out, or if they handle the saw.
Remember the hubbub when President Obama was running for President? The contention that he was not born in the US? AZ is taking the lead again when it comes to stepping on federal toes. It will require all people running for president to give a notarized copy of their birth cetificate to our Secretary of State to be on the ballot. No other candidates will have to do this, just those running for President. So if the Pres wants on the AZ ballot for re-election, he will have to present a notarized birth certificate. But, John McCain and JD Hayworth do not (I question the last one's sanity.).
Now, Sheriff Joe is contemplating running for governor and he has said that if elected, he will not run again. One term and done. At 78, he better get someone strong to run with him for Secretary of State, because that person will surely be governor sooner than expected.
OH, by the way. Everyone over 21 in Arizona can now carry a gun concealed.
And my wife is worried about that snake in the backyard! LOL
Dougnnut
Now, I lived in Illinois for about 54 years, and I saw just about every governor during my lifetime be indicted for something related to his office. (I'm pretty sure that Gov. Ogilvie escaped with his integrity.) Blago was the last straw, though.
When I moved to Arizona, I thought that all that would be left behind. Here, I thought, are people with common sense and who know what the law means. I thought things here would be above board, and truthful and laid back. Man, was I wrong!
Arizona was the last of the 48 contiguous states. It once was part of the Confederacy and its boundary with New Mexico once ran along the Gila River, and the two shared an east/west boundary, not a north/south one. Abe Lincoln changed all that. The capital of the territory/state was moved about five times before deciding on Phoenix. And Arizona was one of the first states to give women the right to vote and hold office...about eight years before the US Constitution. Arizonans, it seems have always been forward thinkers and people who value law and order (ala Wyatt Earp and his brothers).
They never did value education very highly, although the first governor of the state, George W.P. Hunt, got a law passed for mandatory education of 12 days a year for kids up to fourteen years of age! Arizonans do like their guns, and the idea that they vote on just about everything. Coming up in May, we will vote on a sales tax that will be in effect for three years and help fund education and just about everything else. How much? One cent per dollar! That would bring our state sales tax up to 6.6 cents per dollar. Now I know there are places that have less than that, but in Illinois, with all the various taxes, some places were as high as 9 percent. The 48th state ranks 48th in education, but then again, they don't spend money on it. Arizona spends about 6600 dollars per pupil, while Illinois spends close to 8800 dollars.
Now, AZ is in the forfront again when it comes to immigration enforcement! I don't think I have to go into that, as I covered that in previous blogs. Suffice it to say that I approve of the measure, and hope this kicks the Feds in the butt and gets the national debate open. Arizona has gone out on a limb here, and we'll see if other states help out, or if they handle the saw.
Remember the hubbub when President Obama was running for President? The contention that he was not born in the US? AZ is taking the lead again when it comes to stepping on federal toes. It will require all people running for president to give a notarized copy of their birth cetificate to our Secretary of State to be on the ballot. No other candidates will have to do this, just those running for President. So if the Pres wants on the AZ ballot for re-election, he will have to present a notarized birth certificate. But, John McCain and JD Hayworth do not (I question the last one's sanity.).
Now, Sheriff Joe is contemplating running for governor and he has said that if elected, he will not run again. One term and done. At 78, he better get someone strong to run with him for Secretary of State, because that person will surely be governor sooner than expected.
OH, by the way. Everyone over 21 in Arizona can now carry a gun concealed.
And my wife is worried about that snake in the backyard! LOL
Dougnnut
Thursday, April 22, 2010
American Democracy works in AZ
I had a chance to watch American Democracy in action today.
I went down to the state capitol for some training as a docent at the AZ Capitol Museum. When I came out three hours later, the lawn was filled with protestors, TV and radio people, police, and some legislators. People were chanting, yelling, talking, and watching as the drama that is the Arizona Legislature rolls on.
The AZ Legislature has passed a bill that makes it illegal to be in Arizona if you are not in the US legally. SB1070 gives the police the ability to arrest a person if they cannot prove that they are in the US LEGALLY. They use a driver's license, ID card, passport, or green card as proof. Police may ask you to prove your citizenship or alien status during a traffic stop, or if they may stop a person if they Have REASONABLE CAUSE to believe that the person is in the country illegally.
Opponents say this will lead to racial profiling, and people will be pulled over just because of the color of their skin. Proponents believe that no such problem will happen. Is someone is not breakig the law in the first place, then they should not worry. If here illegally, then there could be problems.
Others believe that the Arizona legilature is usurping the US government which is doing nothing about the porous borders of Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. This group believes that the borders should be left up to the feds. BUT, if it is not going to rotect the border, then who should?
Governor Brewer really does not have to do anything. If she does not sign the bill by Saturday, it becomes law anyway. She needs to take a stance, but she probably won't. Either signing or vetoing the law woulud mean political suicide for her re-election. In my eyes, NOT taking a stand means a lot more, and would be the same thing.
The law is a good one. It is time that someone says the unthinkable. We need to close our borders and start making people do things the right way. If I want some to come into my house, then I let them in through the FRONT door. If they break in through the back door or sneak in, then I call the police and file a complaint for burglary. Same here. The people that do things the right way can stay and have nothing to fear. Those that sneak in the back door, they need to be arrested, charged, tried, and if convicted, either imprisoned or deported, or both.
What do you think Mexico does the people who enter that country illegally? Do they give them aid and a driver's license? I don't think so!
This whole thing is much ado about nothing... the laws are there, the Federal government needs to grow a pair and do something.
One final word, US Rep Raul Grijalva needs to step down for calling for a boycott of his own state. He is not representing the state. 70 percent of Arizonans who were questioned, approve of the bill. Grijalva is not putting the will of the people first, but rather the philosophy of some who contributed to his campaign.
Doughnut
I went down to the state capitol for some training as a docent at the AZ Capitol Museum. When I came out three hours later, the lawn was filled with protestors, TV and radio people, police, and some legislators. People were chanting, yelling, talking, and watching as the drama that is the Arizona Legislature rolls on.
The AZ Legislature has passed a bill that makes it illegal to be in Arizona if you are not in the US legally. SB1070 gives the police the ability to arrest a person if they cannot prove that they are in the US LEGALLY. They use a driver's license, ID card, passport, or green card as proof. Police may ask you to prove your citizenship or alien status during a traffic stop, or if they may stop a person if they Have REASONABLE CAUSE to believe that the person is in the country illegally.
Opponents say this will lead to racial profiling, and people will be pulled over just because of the color of their skin. Proponents believe that no such problem will happen. Is someone is not breakig the law in the first place, then they should not worry. If here illegally, then there could be problems.
Others believe that the Arizona legilature is usurping the US government which is doing nothing about the porous borders of Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. This group believes that the borders should be left up to the feds. BUT, if it is not going to rotect the border, then who should?
Governor Brewer really does not have to do anything. If she does not sign the bill by Saturday, it becomes law anyway. She needs to take a stance, but she probably won't. Either signing or vetoing the law woulud mean political suicide for her re-election. In my eyes, NOT taking a stand means a lot more, and would be the same thing.
The law is a good one. It is time that someone says the unthinkable. We need to close our borders and start making people do things the right way. If I want some to come into my house, then I let them in through the FRONT door. If they break in through the back door or sneak in, then I call the police and file a complaint for burglary. Same here. The people that do things the right way can stay and have nothing to fear. Those that sneak in the back door, they need to be arrested, charged, tried, and if convicted, either imprisoned or deported, or both.
What do you think Mexico does the people who enter that country illegally? Do they give them aid and a driver's license? I don't think so!
This whole thing is much ado about nothing... the laws are there, the Federal government needs to grow a pair and do something.
One final word, US Rep Raul Grijalva needs to step down for calling for a boycott of his own state. He is not representing the state. 70 percent of Arizonans who were questioned, approve of the bill. Grijalva is not putting the will of the people first, but rather the philosophy of some who contributed to his campaign.
Doughnut
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Will the Lone Ranger Ride Again?
For everyone that thinks Arizona is still the Wild West, the legislature out here has just confirmed it by passing a law where anyone over 21 can carry a concealed weapon. I am a card carrying concealed weapon advocate. This law, however, puts everyone out here in danger.
Up until this law was passed, anyone could carry a gun in plain sight. If you have a holster, or you wanted to carry your twelve gauge as you walked down the street, you could. Only those fortunate enough to pay $65 dollars and attend 8 hours of training could carry the gun or other weapon under our coat, or hidden in the glove compartment of our cars, or under the seat.
Now anyone can carry it that way, and there is no fee. Imagine, if you will, the poor officer who now pulls over someone for a traffic stop and has to deal with the possible option of a concealed gun. It was always possible, but less likely as there were only about 65,000 licenses out there. Now there could be upwards of 1-2 MILLION! Don't get me wrong, I am an advocate of the 2nd amendment, but some people should not be allowed to have a gun, especially one that is concealed.
Advocates say that crime will go down. But will shootings, accidental or otherwise, go up ? Right now, as a licensed concealed weapons carrier, I am required to give a peace officer help if he needs it. I am to say, "Officer, I am licensed to carry a weapon, to you need help?" When an officer pulls me over, if I have my guy gun, I am required to say, "Officer I am licensed to carry a weapon, and I have it on me. What do you want me to do?"
Now, I think we can expect traffic stops to go this way:
A police officer(s) stop a car for a traffic violation. As they approach the car, they unsnap their holster, and put their hands on their guns. One officer stands to the rear of the vehicle ready to draw....
Officer: Sir (or madam) put your hands on the wheel in plain sight. Please have all your passengers display their hands also.
Driver: What's the problem, officer? Why am I being treated this way?
Officer: Sir (or Madam), Do you or anyone in your vehicle have a weapon of any kind?
Driver: No, Sir.
Officer: Please step out of the car and keep your hands visible.
As you can see, this issue will force all traffic stops to be potentially more dangerous than they already are. People are going to be upset and they are going to mouth back to the officer. Confrontations are possible.
Why did this happen? Because here in Arizona we seem to have a problem with ciminals coming across the border and hurting our citizens. Our state legislature reacted to help protect its citizenry, but I do not think this was the answer. It did cut off its nose to spite its face, though. The loss of the money for licenses is significant.
Now we could go back to those good old, bad old days! We return to those days of yesteryear.
Hi Oh Silver!
Doughnut
Up until this law was passed, anyone could carry a gun in plain sight. If you have a holster, or you wanted to carry your twelve gauge as you walked down the street, you could. Only those fortunate enough to pay $65 dollars and attend 8 hours of training could carry the gun or other weapon under our coat, or hidden in the glove compartment of our cars, or under the seat.
Now anyone can carry it that way, and there is no fee. Imagine, if you will, the poor officer who now pulls over someone for a traffic stop and has to deal with the possible option of a concealed gun. It was always possible, but less likely as there were only about 65,000 licenses out there. Now there could be upwards of 1-2 MILLION! Don't get me wrong, I am an advocate of the 2nd amendment, but some people should not be allowed to have a gun, especially one that is concealed.
Advocates say that crime will go down. But will shootings, accidental or otherwise, go up ? Right now, as a licensed concealed weapons carrier, I am required to give a peace officer help if he needs it. I am to say, "Officer, I am licensed to carry a weapon, to you need help?" When an officer pulls me over, if I have my guy gun, I am required to say, "Officer I am licensed to carry a weapon, and I have it on me. What do you want me to do?"
Now, I think we can expect traffic stops to go this way:
A police officer(s) stop a car for a traffic violation. As they approach the car, they unsnap their holster, and put their hands on their guns. One officer stands to the rear of the vehicle ready to draw....
Officer: Sir (or madam) put your hands on the wheel in plain sight. Please have all your passengers display their hands also.
Driver: What's the problem, officer? Why am I being treated this way?
Officer: Sir (or Madam), Do you or anyone in your vehicle have a weapon of any kind?
Driver: No, Sir.
Officer: Please step out of the car and keep your hands visible.
As you can see, this issue will force all traffic stops to be potentially more dangerous than they already are. People are going to be upset and they are going to mouth back to the officer. Confrontations are possible.
Why did this happen? Because here in Arizona we seem to have a problem with ciminals coming across the border and hurting our citizens. Our state legislature reacted to help protect its citizenry, but I do not think this was the answer. It did cut off its nose to spite its face, though. The loss of the money for licenses is significant.
Now we could go back to those good old, bad old days! We return to those days of yesteryear.
Hi Oh Silver!
Doughnut
Playoff Season
That crazy time of year is here again. It happens about twice a year. No, I am not talking about changes of seasons; that happens more than twice. And, no, I am not thinking of my sex life, my birthday is in August and Christmas is still a long way away. I am speaking of play-off season! WOO WOO! That time of year when some sports are gearing up, while others are concluding.
Playoff season is here for hockey ( who cares?) and pro basketball ( again, who cares?) Oh, for those of you that read the sarcasm, that was not me talking, that was Bad Don. You see, Bad Don has no feeling for these two events. He thinks they go on way too long. The NBA just started their playoffs and will not finish with a champion until June sometime! By that time, it will be time to start training camp again.
And Hockey? Even Good Don has a hard time watching that. Both the Dons feel that hockey it tantamount to NASCAR on ice. We can't follow the puck (better watch my fingers, there) and we have a hard time with the rules. Really, in NASCAR guys can bump each other like in hockey, but they get mad when someone does, but you don't see them throw their helmets and gloves and duke it out, they just run into each other at 150 miles per hour. In hockey, the teams skate very fast, collide with each other, throw off the gloves, and assault each other, but no one goes to jail.
The NBA needs to get more of a clue. The playoffs go way too long and really, do we need a best of whatever to decide who the winner is? When we were kids, we only used that if we lost and then we'd scream, "Best two out of three!" and if we lost again, "Best three out of five!" Come on, be men. Step up and make it one and done! Winner advances. But, then again, they do have to pay salaries, don't they?
I'll watch both on tape delay. That way I can zip through the commercials and the really boring spots, like Doug Collins commentary. And I can laugh when I make the hockey players pick up their gloves, or skate backwards really fast.
Where's curling when you need it? No, wait... I have the Cubs to abuse me for a while....
Doughnut
Playoff season is here for hockey ( who cares?) and pro basketball ( again, who cares?) Oh, for those of you that read the sarcasm, that was not me talking, that was Bad Don. You see, Bad Don has no feeling for these two events. He thinks they go on way too long. The NBA just started their playoffs and will not finish with a champion until June sometime! By that time, it will be time to start training camp again.
And Hockey? Even Good Don has a hard time watching that. Both the Dons feel that hockey it tantamount to NASCAR on ice. We can't follow the puck (better watch my fingers, there) and we have a hard time with the rules. Really, in NASCAR guys can bump each other like in hockey, but they get mad when someone does, but you don't see them throw their helmets and gloves and duke it out, they just run into each other at 150 miles per hour. In hockey, the teams skate very fast, collide with each other, throw off the gloves, and assault each other, but no one goes to jail.
The NBA needs to get more of a clue. The playoffs go way too long and really, do we need a best of whatever to decide who the winner is? When we were kids, we only used that if we lost and then we'd scream, "Best two out of three!" and if we lost again, "Best three out of five!" Come on, be men. Step up and make it one and done! Winner advances. But, then again, they do have to pay salaries, don't they?
I'll watch both on tape delay. That way I can zip through the commercials and the really boring spots, like Doug Collins commentary. And I can laugh when I make the hockey players pick up their gloves, or skate backwards really fast.
Where's curling when you need it? No, wait... I have the Cubs to abuse me for a while....
Doughnut
Friday, April 16, 2010
A Great Day All Around
Thursday was a red letter day in Phoenix and in my short life as author.
First, yesterday was the first day that the temperature hit 90 this year. I would not have believed that, but then again, I spent the majority of the day in the Arizona Capitol Museum as an ambassador. That is a fancy name for running the information desk. Things were not too busy, and I answered most questions with aplomb and veracity. This means I was jovial and confident and only gave one statement which was false. I didn't lie to people, I just got my information wrong. I was quickly corrected and learned a lesson that I have trouble grasping, unlike most 5th graders here in AZ. Am I smarter than a 5th grader? Not when it comes to the state seal of Arizona.
Apparently most students by the 5th grade know that the state seal contains the 5 symbols of what makes Arizona tick. Try as I will, I have trouble recalling them at will. I guess I have to write them down on my hand or something... Cotton, Citrus, Copper, Cattle, and Climate. (I actually struggled writing this as I was trying to remember Climate. I usually insert the standby Commerce when I have a brain fart like that.) But still, the day was fantastic as I met people from Canada, Eastern Europe, Germany, Hawaii, Utah, and Michigan. One woman was surprised when she held up a Flat Stanley, and I asked HIM how his trip was! Then, as any good ambassador does, I gave her ideas for picture shoots with Stanley.
On the outside of the museum, "the heat was hot and the ground was dry and the air was full of sound." to paraphrase America. But, when I got off my shift, I put on my cowboy hat (Yes, I now have a full fledged cowboy hat. It is brown and looks like Gene Autry's, the Singing Cowboy.), dropped the top on the convertible, and rode my steed home.
Which brings me to the second good thing.
I received an email from Authorhouse, the publisher of my book, "Growing Up Doughnut," with the ideas for pricing and the news that the book will be available in e-book format. That means that all that money you spent on a Kindle or a Nook, or an IPad will not go to waste. You will be able to download the book soon in that format for around 10 dollars. I will let you know when.
Just for a teaser... I am going to give you a peek at the working cover....
It may be too small to see clearly, but that is me on the front with my mom circa 1956!
Have a great day. And may all your doughnutholes be small!
Doughnut
First, yesterday was the first day that the temperature hit 90 this year. I would not have believed that, but then again, I spent the majority of the day in the Arizona Capitol Museum as an ambassador. That is a fancy name for running the information desk. Things were not too busy, and I answered most questions with aplomb and veracity. This means I was jovial and confident and only gave one statement which was false. I didn't lie to people, I just got my information wrong. I was quickly corrected and learned a lesson that I have trouble grasping, unlike most 5th graders here in AZ. Am I smarter than a 5th grader? Not when it comes to the state seal of Arizona.
Apparently most students by the 5th grade know that the state seal contains the 5 symbols of what makes Arizona tick. Try as I will, I have trouble recalling them at will. I guess I have to write them down on my hand or something... Cotton, Citrus, Copper, Cattle, and Climate. (I actually struggled writing this as I was trying to remember Climate. I usually insert the standby Commerce when I have a brain fart like that.) But still, the day was fantastic as I met people from Canada, Eastern Europe, Germany, Hawaii, Utah, and Michigan. One woman was surprised when she held up a Flat Stanley, and I asked HIM how his trip was! Then, as any good ambassador does, I gave her ideas for picture shoots with Stanley.
On the outside of the museum, "the heat was hot and the ground was dry and the air was full of sound." to paraphrase America. But, when I got off my shift, I put on my cowboy hat (Yes, I now have a full fledged cowboy hat. It is brown and looks like Gene Autry's, the Singing Cowboy.), dropped the top on the convertible, and rode my steed home.
Which brings me to the second good thing.
I received an email from Authorhouse, the publisher of my book, "Growing Up Doughnut," with the ideas for pricing and the news that the book will be available in e-book format. That means that all that money you spent on a Kindle or a Nook, or an IPad will not go to waste. You will be able to download the book soon in that format for around 10 dollars. I will let you know when.
Just for a teaser... I am going to give you a peek at the working cover....
It may be too small to see clearly, but that is me on the front with my mom circa 1956!
Have a great day. And may all your doughnutholes be small!
Doughnut
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
School leader Searches Lunches
This a warning to readers.... the Fat Guy Is About to Go Ballistic! I can't believe the article I just read about a school in Tucson...I am incensed!
At a private school in Tucson (ok, its private, they can do what they want) the leader of the school has BANNED all white bread, any food made with processed flour, anything with sugar. Only all natural certified foods are allowed. One student had their lunch CONFISCATED because it had a flour tortilla in it.
The leader of this school and founder of this school, Nancy Aiken, apparently sees herself as the food nazi and has banned anything that is processed. Since her school has no cafeteria, all foods must be brought from home, and teachers search each lunch sacks everyday for contraband. Aiken who says she has a PhD in cellular biology, claims to have the answer to childhood obesity. If all families followed her rules,she says, obesity would not be a problem. Did this lady fail at her career as a researcher and decide to open up a school? I mean, she does get state money besides the tuition that is paid.
Can you imagine one day taking the lunch that mom has packed for you and having your teacher take it away because you have "natural" orange juice and not 100 percent fruit juice? Or how about that peanut butter sandwich with jelly? It gets confiscated because you have it on white bread and not 32 grain whole wheat. You get a peanut butter sandwich on the 32 grain bread and some honey! No oreos, no doughnuts, no ham sandwiches (ham after all is processed).
Although I doubt that this will ever become a way of life for schools, it could if budget cuts close cafeterias and kids have to start bringing their lunches.
One question... do the teachers get to eat the lunches they confiscate or do they throw them away? Maybe they could be shipped somewhere to people who are hungry and really do not care if they are getting to much white flour or processed sugar.
I think I will send the school a couple dozen doughnuts.... whole wheat of course.
Doughnut
At a private school in Tucson (ok, its private, they can do what they want) the leader of the school has BANNED all white bread, any food made with processed flour, anything with sugar. Only all natural certified foods are allowed. One student had their lunch CONFISCATED because it had a flour tortilla in it.
The leader of this school and founder of this school, Nancy Aiken, apparently sees herself as the food nazi and has banned anything that is processed. Since her school has no cafeteria, all foods must be brought from home, and teachers search each lunch sacks everyday for contraband. Aiken who says she has a PhD in cellular biology, claims to have the answer to childhood obesity. If all families followed her rules,she says, obesity would not be a problem. Did this lady fail at her career as a researcher and decide to open up a school? I mean, she does get state money besides the tuition that is paid.
Can you imagine one day taking the lunch that mom has packed for you and having your teacher take it away because you have "natural" orange juice and not 100 percent fruit juice? Or how about that peanut butter sandwich with jelly? It gets confiscated because you have it on white bread and not 32 grain whole wheat. You get a peanut butter sandwich on the 32 grain bread and some honey! No oreos, no doughnuts, no ham sandwiches (ham after all is processed).
Although I doubt that this will ever become a way of life for schools, it could if budget cuts close cafeterias and kids have to start bringing their lunches.
One question... do the teachers get to eat the lunches they confiscate or do they throw them away? Maybe they could be shipped somewhere to people who are hungry and really do not care if they are getting to much white flour or processed sugar.
I think I will send the school a couple dozen doughnuts.... whole wheat of course.
Doughnut
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
The Joker To The Rescue at Tax Time
Tax day is near! Tax day is near!
Imagine Paul Revere riding through the countryside screaming this as a warning! He may as well have we are undergoing the same problem that those colonists had. No, someone in redcoats are not coming, but people honed on redtape are. The Taxman!
Used to be that nothing was sure except death and taxes. Now, it's just death. We are never sure, though, when it comes. We are sure, however, when taxes are due...THURSDAY for those of you who pay them.
I say, "who pay them" because a report released last week showed that only about 47% of you out there actually pay taxes. That means that of the 22 people who actively read my ramblings, about 10 of you don't pay, while the rest of us do. We foot the bill.
But, you say, you do not make enough money or you have enough deductions to get you out of it. PSHAW! Don't get me wrong, I take advantage of all the tax breaks I can get, but there seems to be something wrong with the idea that I make far less money and pay MORE in taxes than I did last year. About twice as much. Last year, my wife's Aunt Dorothy who is 86 and living in assisted living, received money back. This year, she is receiving about 800% percent less!
There are about 565 people out there who make laws and 300 million of us who are expected to follow those laws. How much input did you have? Do you find yourself frustrated with the lack of concern and communication your representative and senator have for your problems? When was the last time their office contacted you and asked for your opinion? What happened to the belief of "No Taxation without Representation?" Are you being represented?
I got two words..."Term limits" Right now, the only member of our government that does have term limits is the Executive Branch. Not the legislative or the judiciary!
Another two words..."Flat Tax" Every corporation, company, person, church, and "non-profit" should pay a fee to the government. No deductions for anything. We all share the same freedoms and protections, we should all pay for them. What if everyone paid a percentage, say 10 percent. Microsoft would contribute a couple bilion, so would McDonald's. Don Shields might contribute a couple grand, while Don Trump a couple million. But the percentage would be the same. Some would cry, "Unfair! You are penalizing me for being successful. Why should I pay more than you? It is not my fault you are too lazy to work and make more money!"
Right now, there are deep inequities within the tax code. Did you know that the directions for the 1040 are actually 100 pages long? And the IRS says that the directions are easy enough for a normal person to do their own taxes. Right. That is why I paid 350 dollars for someone to do my taxes.
To paraphrase the Jack Nicholson's character of the Joker in the first Batman movie, "...this country's tax laws needs an enema!"
Doughnut
P.S. Beware the Ides of April!
Imagine Paul Revere riding through the countryside screaming this as a warning! He may as well have we are undergoing the same problem that those colonists had. No, someone in redcoats are not coming, but people honed on redtape are. The Taxman!
Used to be that nothing was sure except death and taxes. Now, it's just death. We are never sure, though, when it comes. We are sure, however, when taxes are due...THURSDAY for those of you who pay them.
I say, "who pay them" because a report released last week showed that only about 47% of you out there actually pay taxes. That means that of the 22 people who actively read my ramblings, about 10 of you don't pay, while the rest of us do. We foot the bill.
But, you say, you do not make enough money or you have enough deductions to get you out of it. PSHAW! Don't get me wrong, I take advantage of all the tax breaks I can get, but there seems to be something wrong with the idea that I make far less money and pay MORE in taxes than I did last year. About twice as much. Last year, my wife's Aunt Dorothy who is 86 and living in assisted living, received money back. This year, she is receiving about 800% percent less!
There are about 565 people out there who make laws and 300 million of us who are expected to follow those laws. How much input did you have? Do you find yourself frustrated with the lack of concern and communication your representative and senator have for your problems? When was the last time their office contacted you and asked for your opinion? What happened to the belief of "No Taxation without Representation?" Are you being represented?
I got two words..."Term limits" Right now, the only member of our government that does have term limits is the Executive Branch. Not the legislative or the judiciary!
Another two words..."Flat Tax" Every corporation, company, person, church, and "non-profit" should pay a fee to the government. No deductions for anything. We all share the same freedoms and protections, we should all pay for them. What if everyone paid a percentage, say 10 percent. Microsoft would contribute a couple bilion, so would McDonald's. Don Shields might contribute a couple grand, while Don Trump a couple million. But the percentage would be the same. Some would cry, "Unfair! You are penalizing me for being successful. Why should I pay more than you? It is not my fault you are too lazy to work and make more money!"
Right now, there are deep inequities within the tax code. Did you know that the directions for the 1040 are actually 100 pages long? And the IRS says that the directions are easy enough for a normal person to do their own taxes. Right. That is why I paid 350 dollars for someone to do my taxes.
To paraphrase the Jack Nicholson's character of the Joker in the first Batman movie, "...this country's tax laws needs an enema!"
Doughnut
P.S. Beware the Ides of April!
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Flat Stanly in Sedona
We went to church today, then left for an afternoon in Sedona, the magnetic center of the universe. Along with us were our two offspring and a flat friend by the name of Stanley. The kids took up room and cost me money, but we had a great time laughing and, as usual, making fun of me. Stanley took up no space, cost me no money, but he did not say much; he just sat there in my wife's purse with that happy face on him, constantly waving. He was oblivious to what was going on and still he was having a great time.
We stopped in Sedona at Bell Rock and Jim took Stanley's picture looking like he was holding Bell Rock. Stanley, in his usual way, was more than happy to pose for others that wanted his picture in their vacation shots. We laughed about Stanley, and we made some new acquaintances.
We told Stan that Sedona is known for UFO sightings and so he wanted to see a UFO. We could not really stay to wait and hope for a real one, so we stopped in a little shop just inside of Sedona where there is a replica of what an alien spaceship might look like. Stan just had to have his picture taken with the "Alien". 
While he was doing this, I listened to a conversation in the store between the shop keeper and a customer. They discussed the idea that Sedona has an area similar to Area 51 outside it which houses UFOs and has been the site of many encounters with alien ships and happenings where an alter dimension (Ala Fringe
) has happened.
As a matter of fact, if you take a close look to the right of Stan in the picture, you can see the shadow of someone watching him! (Cue Twilight Zone music here)
On the way home, Stanley almost got to experience a high speed wreck when we were traveling down the I-17. We were going about 75 miles per hour passing another car, and were just about to get even with it. In my rear view mirror, I spied an orange Pontiac Solstice coming up on us at an extremely high speed. I thought he would slow down, but he didn't. He tried to pass us on the right and then made a move to go between us as if we were on a NASCAR track. There was not enough room and only dropoff to either side. I slammed on the breaks, and the Jerk (sorry, it got me riled just thinking about it) whipped in front of us, almost clipping the right front of our car and causing a pile up. I layed on my horn, flashed my lights, but, (get this) he put his hand out the window and waved!!!! And where is DPS when you need them?
Anyway, the day was relaxing for the most part and certainly enjoyable. If Flat Stanley did not have a good time, he certainly did not say anything.
doughnut
Thursday, April 8, 2010
OSC Report: Prescott VA Has Problems
A couple of blogs ago, I told you of the troubles that my brother-in-law had up at the Prescott VA. On Thursday, a story in the Daily Courier told of an investigation into possible problems that were brought to light by nurse Jerri Bedell who was fired after she came forward with information and blew the whistle.
The report vindicated her, but still she is a personna non grata in the medical industry. Bedell did to the Prescott VA what was tantamount to telling us that the Pentagon pays $100 dollars for a $20 dollar hammer, or that Sheriff Joe bought a bus without asking for permission. She should be protected by federal whistleblower laws. But, she cannot find a job.
The probem with the report was that it did not go far enough. The investigation only went so far as to say that some employees at the Bob Stump Veterans Administration Medical Center used drugs illegally. It did not go into the abuse of patients by the staff.
It did not go into the pervasive feeling of employees that they cannot bring to light injustices and malpractice that is going on up there. There are people that would come forward, but they have been threatened with their jobs and careers, and they are in no position to rock the boat. The feds certainly are not protecting them.
If the Office of the Special Counsel is really interested in justice and doing the right thing, It should keep the investigation going and dig deeper. Heads should roll. But, since the report has already been forwarded to President Obama, it is most likely closed and the true victims. the veterans, will never be heard from or about. The truth is, it did not want to go deeper.
My question in this is, "Where is John McCain?" McCain is the head of the veteran affairs committee and purports himself to be the champion of vets. Why is he not arraigning hearings, doing investigations by his committee? If there this is going on in Prescott, could it be happening in other places? Don't our vets deserve more answers and better care? Why does he hide his head in the sand?
Probably too busy trying to find a stake for J.D. Hayworth.
Doughnut
The report vindicated her, but still she is a personna non grata in the medical industry. Bedell did to the Prescott VA what was tantamount to telling us that the Pentagon pays $100 dollars for a $20 dollar hammer, or that Sheriff Joe bought a bus without asking for permission. She should be protected by federal whistleblower laws. But, she cannot find a job.
The probem with the report was that it did not go far enough. The investigation only went so far as to say that some employees at the Bob Stump Veterans Administration Medical Center used drugs illegally. It did not go into the abuse of patients by the staff.
It did not go into the pervasive feeling of employees that they cannot bring to light injustices and malpractice that is going on up there. There are people that would come forward, but they have been threatened with their jobs and careers, and they are in no position to rock the boat. The feds certainly are not protecting them.
If the Office of the Special Counsel is really interested in justice and doing the right thing, It should keep the investigation going and dig deeper. Heads should roll. But, since the report has already been forwarded to President Obama, it is most likely closed and the true victims. the veterans, will never be heard from or about. The truth is, it did not want to go deeper.
My question in this is, "Where is John McCain?" McCain is the head of the veteran affairs committee and purports himself to be the champion of vets. Why is he not arraigning hearings, doing investigations by his committee? If there this is going on in Prescott, could it be happening in other places? Don't our vets deserve more answers and better care? Why does he hide his head in the sand?
Probably too busy trying to find a stake for J.D. Hayworth.
Doughnut
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
AZ Capital Museum a Hidden Treasure
Maybe it is my age, but I like old things. Old cars, Old TVs, Old rocks, especially when they are associated with a museum.
I had the privilege yesterday of going down to the Arizona Capital Museum and volunteering to be a guide or an ambassador a couple days a week. I have time on my hands since I seem to be unemployable for money, so I may as well do something that interests me. And museums always interest me. I love to walk through and read all the cards and displays and discover happenings I did not know about. Since I moved to Arizona just a couple years ago, the Capital Museum gives me an opportunity to constantly discover history.
The museum is in the old State Capital Building which sets between the modern House of Representatives and the Senate in part of the capital complex in downtown Phoenix near 1700 W. Washington. It is a constant reminder to the senators and representatives of the state of the rich heritage and struggle that the Arizona Territory had in becoming the 48th state.
From the giant doors, to the halls of the old chambers of the legislature, to the copper dome, this museum, though tiny, abounds with the history of the Grand Canyon State. The exhibits range from parts of the USS Arizona which was sunk at Pearl Harbor, to arifacts from the first state veterinary officer, to efforts on conservation. One can even enter the chambers and sit at desk used in the old legislature with name of the person who occupied the desk emblazoned on it.
There are many stories to be read and heard from the guides and ambassadors that are in the museum, and they offer up tidbits that aren't very well known. Because as we all know, behind every story, there is the "rest of the story" (Paul Harvey did his radio show from here in Phoenix.)
The famous Harvey Girls, the origins of the SRP, a flag that went up San Juan Hill, dinnerware from the Arizona, the Merci Train exhibit are all fascinating reminders of the history of this young state.
With help from Jason and Luke at the museum, I hope to turn into a decent docent.
Doughnut
I had the privilege yesterday of going down to the Arizona Capital Museum and volunteering to be a guide or an ambassador a couple days a week. I have time on my hands since I seem to be unemployable for money, so I may as well do something that interests me. And museums always interest me. I love to walk through and read all the cards and displays and discover happenings I did not know about. Since I moved to Arizona just a couple years ago, the Capital Museum gives me an opportunity to constantly discover history.
The museum is in the old State Capital Building which sets between the modern House of Representatives and the Senate in part of the capital complex in downtown Phoenix near 1700 W. Washington. It is a constant reminder to the senators and representatives of the state of the rich heritage and struggle that the Arizona Territory had in becoming the 48th state.
From the giant doors, to the halls of the old chambers of the legislature, to the copper dome, this museum, though tiny, abounds with the history of the Grand Canyon State. The exhibits range from parts of the USS Arizona which was sunk at Pearl Harbor, to arifacts from the first state veterinary officer, to efforts on conservation. One can even enter the chambers and sit at desk used in the old legislature with name of the person who occupied the desk emblazoned on it.
There are many stories to be read and heard from the guides and ambassadors that are in the museum, and they offer up tidbits that aren't very well known. Because as we all know, behind every story, there is the "rest of the story" (Paul Harvey did his radio show from here in Phoenix.)
The famous Harvey Girls, the origins of the SRP, a flag that went up San Juan Hill, dinnerware from the Arizona, the Merci Train exhibit are all fascinating reminders of the history of this young state.
With help from Jason and Luke at the museum, I hope to turn into a decent docent.
Doughnut
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Flat Stanley and the Border Patrol
I went this weekend to Tucson. We stayed at a wonderful Radisson Hotel near the airport. But that is not what this is about. Today is about my travels with a friend, Flat Stanley.
Flat Stanley was sent to me by my great-nephew Alex Sanders who lives in Hannibal, MO (you know, the "Show Me" state.) His class is doing a project with their reading of the book, Flat Stanley. Stanley Lampchop is flattened in his sleep one night by a bulletin board given to him by his father. Stanley survives, but he now gets to go on some great adventures because he can be mailed to people. Alex mailed Stanley to us, and we have been showing him around Arizona.
This weekend we went to Tombstone and looked around "The Town That Wouldn't Die." We had a great time, and I was amazed at how many people there knew who Stanley was, and were more than willing to hold him while we took their picture! I felt like I was escorting some kind of celebrity around.
Stanley had is picture taken next to cowboys, stagecoaches, buildings, and even cactus. Folks were very accomodating, with one cowboy even recognizing Stanley as we walked down the sidewalk and insisted on getting his picture taken with him! A shopkeeper posed with him, and another put Stanley inside a pair of cowboy boots... We laughed with total strangers all day.
On our way back to Tucson, we had to stop at a Border Patrol barricade. We were certain that we would have trouble proving that Stanley was an American Citizen and we thought that he might get detained and possibly deported. As we pulled up to the officer and rolled down our windows, he asked, "Are you all American Citizens in the car?" We said we were, but we were not sure about our passenger. The officer quizzed us, "Can I see your passenger?"
I held up Stanley, and the officer got a big smile on his face, and exclaimed, "Stanley! It is good to see you!" We had no problem, and Stanley had his picture taken with the Border Patrol.
On Monday, Stanley is going with me to the Arizona Capitol Historic Museum as I talk to them about volunteering as a docent. I am sure we will have a great time. Next weekend, Stanley is going to Sedona so he can see the Red Rocks and maybe experience the magnetism of the vorteces up there!
Oh, and Alex, I have to tell you that we are going to a Suns game, so he will probably learn to like purple instead of that green the Celtics wear!
Uncle Doughnut
Flat Stanley was sent to me by my great-nephew Alex Sanders who lives in Hannibal, MO (you know, the "Show Me" state.) His class is doing a project with their reading of the book, Flat Stanley. Stanley Lampchop is flattened in his sleep one night by a bulletin board given to him by his father. Stanley survives, but he now gets to go on some great adventures because he can be mailed to people. Alex mailed Stanley to us, and we have been showing him around Arizona.
This weekend we went to Tombstone and looked around "The Town That Wouldn't Die." We had a great time, and I was amazed at how many people there knew who Stanley was, and were more than willing to hold him while we took their picture! I felt like I was escorting some kind of celebrity around.
Stanley had is picture taken next to cowboys, stagecoaches, buildings, and even cactus. Folks were very accomodating, with one cowboy even recognizing Stanley as we walked down the sidewalk and insisted on getting his picture taken with him! A shopkeeper posed with him, and another put Stanley inside a pair of cowboy boots... We laughed with total strangers all day.
On our way back to Tucson, we had to stop at a Border Patrol barricade. We were certain that we would have trouble proving that Stanley was an American Citizen and we thought that he might get detained and possibly deported. As we pulled up to the officer and rolled down our windows, he asked, "Are you all American Citizens in the car?" We said we were, but we were not sure about our passenger. The officer quizzed us, "Can I see your passenger?"
I held up Stanley, and the officer got a big smile on his face, and exclaimed, "Stanley! It is good to see you!" We had no problem, and Stanley had his picture taken with the Border Patrol.
On Monday, Stanley is going with me to the Arizona Capitol Historic Museum as I talk to them about volunteering as a docent. I am sure we will have a great time. Next weekend, Stanley is going to Sedona so he can see the Red Rocks and maybe experience the magnetism of the vorteces up there!
Oh, and Alex, I have to tell you that we are going to a Suns game, so he will probably learn to like purple instead of that green the Celtics wear!
Uncle Doughnut
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)